Back to Blog
KPIs & Operations September 29, 2024 2 min read

Is Tracking Time an Outdated Approach?

Time tracking in MSPs is controversial. It's not the villain you think — the problem is the tools, not the practice.

Is time tracking in IT support and MSP environments still valuable, or has it become obsolete?

SaaS vs. IT Delivery

Software-as-a-service support models track metrics like customer acquisition cost. MSPs should focus on service consumption metrics that truly reflect client interactions — understanding what’s working and identifying improvement areas.

The Platforms Aren’t Modernized

Current ticketing systems feel outdated, cumbersome, and create significant friction for technicians. PSA vendors need to completely rethink and potentially rebuild their platforms from the ground up to improve both technician and end-user experiences.

Time Entry Is Painful

While acknowledging resistance to time tracking, it remains essential for knowledge-based businesses. Time tracking effectively measures value contribution, benefiting all parties involved.

Time Entry Shouldn’t Be Painful

The solution isn’t eliminating time tracking but making it effortless. The 80/20 rule applies — logging 6 of 8 work hours suffices; detailed 15-minute increments create unnecessary overhead.

Quiet Clients Matter Too

Accounts generating over 70% margins warrant equal attention. Account management should focus on fostering strong relationships and understanding the needs of all clients, regardless of profitability levels.

Measuring Profitability

Month-to-month profitability measurements lack meaning, but identifying trends is crucial. If profit margins consistently decline, investigation and corrective action are necessary.

Time Isn’t Everything

Multiple metrics create context for better decision-making. Track “expensive tickets” — those exceeding 4 hours — to ensure timely resolution and prevent scope creep.

Time Entry Misses Backend Work

Time tracking doesn’t capture centralized platform maintenance costs (RMM, antivirus, backup systems). However, these distributed costs should show net positive departmental efficiency without disproportionately burdening individual clients.

Emotional Cost of a Client

Service agreements should factor in relationship difficulty. My MSP charged problematic clients more and maintained a quarterly “shit list” of five challenging clients to guide retention decisions.

Account Management Cost

Account managers can be tracked as overhead or SG&A expenses. While detailed time logging from salespeople is unrealistic, it is beneficial if they log key activities, such as major meetings, TBRs, and project reviews.

The Future of Time Tracking

Machine learning could automate time analysis, similar to O365 monitoring or RescueTime, eliminating manual entry burdens.

Cultural Differentiation

Strong cultures can coexist with time accountability. I’ve observed highly engaged staff in organizations prioritizing time tracking. However, excessive oversight — tracking bathroom breaks or specific lunch durations — proves counterproductive.

Time Entry Isn’t The Bad Guy

Current methods are flawed but fixable. Modern PSA systems could leverage metadata from tools and asset interactions to automatically attribute work to specific clients, reducing manual burden while maintaining visibility.

It’s not that you can’t run a decent business without it; I simply feel that time tracking isn’t the villain you might think it is.

For more on operational efficiency with AI, check out ERP106 - AI for MSPs.

TK

Todd Kane

Founder of Evolved Management. Helps MSP operations leaders build teams that run without them through group coaching, consulting, and operational frameworks.

More about Todd